1984 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,343 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (170 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero weights approximately 460 kg more than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (271 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Oldsmobile Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Colt | Alero |
Year Released | 1984 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1437 cc | 3343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 271 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2720 mm |