1984 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1984 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Colt | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1437 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2490 mm |