1984 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Pajero. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Pajero. (202 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Citroen |
Model | Pajero | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2477 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 202 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |