1984 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 245 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma (118 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1982 Skoda L | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Skoda |
| Model | Sigma | L |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2410 mm |
