1984 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2002 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2002 Ford Windstar is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2002 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Sigma | Windstar |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5103 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1946 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3066 mm |