1984 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2012 Audi S3
To start off, 2012 Audi S3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi S3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi S3 (261 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 2012 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2012 Audi S3 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
| Model | Sigma | S3 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 261 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
