1984 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Bluebird. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 516 kg more than 1984 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Bluebird. (152 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Bluebird.

Compare all specifications: