1984 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,952 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Bluebird. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Bluebird.

Because 1984 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Bluebird. (152 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Bluebird.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Nissan Bluebird 2009 Volkswagen Polo
Make Nissan Volkswagen
Model Bluebird Polo
Year Released 1984 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1952 cc 1781 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 94 HP 149 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 152 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 1950 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 3920 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1470 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2470 mm