1984 Nissan Micra vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Micra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Micra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 193 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Micra. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Micra.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Micra. (74 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Nissan Micra | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Micra | UTE |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 988 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 74 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |