1984 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1984 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 420 kg more than 1984 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Nissan Pulsar | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Nissan | Studebaker |
Model | Pulsar | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1984 | 1960 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2980 mm |