1984 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 1996 Subaru Outback is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Subaru Outback (165 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Subaru Outback (221 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 1996 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Nissan Pulsar | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Nissan | Subaru |
| Model | Pulsar | Outback |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 96 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2530 mm |
