1984 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2010 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Pulsar.

Because 2010 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. 2010 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1984 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1984 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: