1984 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (143 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1984 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 408 (240 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 2010 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Nissan Pulsar | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
| Make | Nissan | Peugeot |
| Model | Pulsar | 408 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 96 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1815 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2710 mm |
