1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1963 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 350 kg more than 1963 Opel Rekord.
Because 1963 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1963 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Opel |
Model | Cutlass | Rekord |
Year Released | 1984 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2650 mm |