1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1968 Riley 4
To start off, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Riley 4 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 172 kg more than 1968 Riley 4.
Because 1968 Riley 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Riley 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1968 Riley 4 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Riley |
Model | Cutlass | 4 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2530 mm |