1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1989 Skoda L
To start off, 1989 Skoda L is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 435 kg more than 1989 Skoda L.
Because 1989 Skoda L is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Skoda L. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1989 Skoda L | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Skoda |
| Model | Cutlass | L |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 58 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
