1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,473 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (140 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero weights approximately 189 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (203 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Oldsmobile Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cutlass | Alero |
Year Released | 1984 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2473 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 140 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1359 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2720 mm |