1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Swift is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2010 Suzuki Swift has manual transmission. 2010 Suzuki Swift will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Suzuki |
Model | Cutlass | Swift |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2430 mm |