1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Volvo V70
To start off, 2010 Volvo V70 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo V70 weights approximately 278 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
| Model | Cutlass | V70 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1598 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2820 mm |
