1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Express is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Express is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Chevrolet Express. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 Chevrolet Express | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cutlass | Express |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5692 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2012 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3429 mm |
