1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2012 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2012 Ford Taurus is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Taurus weights approximately 501 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2012 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
Model | Cutlass | Taurus |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1821 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5154 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1935 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2868 mm |