1984 Oldsmobile Omega vs. 1976 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 1984 Oldsmobile Omega is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Toyota Mark II (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 65 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Oldsmobile Omega (183 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1984 Oldsmobile Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Oldsmobile Omega | 1976 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
| Model | Omega | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 107 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2590 mm |
