1984 Oldsmobile Omega vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Oldsmobile Omega (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Oldsmobile Omega should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 35 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Oldsmobile Omega (183 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1984 Oldsmobile Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Oldsmobile Omega | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
Model | Omega | Clio |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2630 mm |