1984 Oldsmobile Omega vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 268 more horse power than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega.
Because 2012 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Oldsmobile Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Oldsmobile Omega | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Holden |
| Model | Omega | UTE |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
