1984 Peugeot Quasar vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Peugeot Quasar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Peugeot Quasar would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Peugeot Quasar (600 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 446 more horse power than 2002 Honda CR-V. (154 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Peugeot Quasar should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda CR-V (144 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Peugeot Quasar. (133 Nm). This means 2002 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Peugeot Quasar. 1984 Peugeot Quasar has automatic transmission and 2002 Honda CR-V has manual transmission. 2002 Honda CR-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Peugeot Quasar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Peugeot Quasar | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Peugeot | Honda |
| Model | Quasar | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
