1984 Peugeot Quasar vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Peugeot Quasar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Peugeot Quasar would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Peugeot Quasar (600 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 461 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Peugeot Quasar should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1984 Peugeot Quasar is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Peugeot Quasar will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (181 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Peugeot Quasar. (133 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Peugeot Quasar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Peugeot Quasar | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Peugeot | Mazda |
| Model | Quasar | 6 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
