1984 Plymouth Caravelle vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2002 Volvo S60. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (285 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Plymouth Caravelle | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Plymouth | Volvo |
Model | Caravelle | S60 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2670 mm |