1984 Plymouth Caravelle vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1984 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Plymouth Caravelle weights approximately 100 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Plymouth Caravelle (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1984 Plymouth Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Plymouth Caravelle | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Plymouth | Renault |
Model | Caravelle | Clio |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2690 mm |