1984 Plymouth Reliant vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Plymouth Reliant | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Plymouth | Ford |
Model | Reliant | Ranger |
Year Released | 1984 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3193 mm |