1984 Plymouth Voyager vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1984 Plymouth Voyager is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 216 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Plymouth Voyager | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Plymouth | Sunbeam |
| Model | Voyager | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2190 mm |
