1984 Pontiac Trans Am vs. 1982 Renault 14
To start off, 1984 Pontiac Trans Am is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 14 would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 14, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Pontiac Trans Am | 1982 Renault 14 | |
Make | Pontiac | Renault |
Model | Trans Am | 14 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4998 cc | 1217 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 69 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2410 mm |