1984 Pontiac Trans Am vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Pontiac Trans Am. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Pontiac Trans Am | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Pontiac | Jeep |
Model | Trans Am | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4998 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 285 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2946 mm |