1984 Renault 18 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 18 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Renault 18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1984 Renault 18. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault 18.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault 18. (103 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Renault 18 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Renault | Nissan |
| Model | 18 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 46 L |
