1984 Renault 25 vs. 2000 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2000 Toyota Crown is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 25 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Renault 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Renault 25 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2000 Toyota Crown.
Because 2000 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Renault 25 | 2000 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 25 | Crown |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2664 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
