1984 Renault 25 vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 25 would be higher. At 2,982 cc, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (193 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1984 Renault 25. (107 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Renault 25 weights approximately 211 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Because 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Renault 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (280 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault 25. (160 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Renault 25 | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 25 | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 2982 cc |
| Horse Power | 107 HP | 193 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 944 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 87 L |
