1984 Renault 25 vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 25 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1984 Renault 25. (122 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 288 kg more than 1984 Renault 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault 25. (193 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Renault 25 | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Renault | Nissan |
Model | 25 | Rogue |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 60 L |