1984 Renault 5 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 5 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Renault 5 (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Renault 5 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 50 kg more than 1984 Renault 5.
Because 1984 Renault 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Renault 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Renault 5 (221 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1984 Renault 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Renault 5 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | 5 | Clio |
Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 50 L |