1984 Renault 5 vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault 5 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Renault 5 (296 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2012 Ford Falcon. (265 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Renault 5 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 821 kg more than 1984 Renault 5.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (409 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault 5. (340 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Renault 5 | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | 5 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 409 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | LPG |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 68 L |