1984 Renault R5 vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault R5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault R5 would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan NP300 (131 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1984 Renault R5. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault R5.
Because 2010 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Renault R5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan NP300 (304 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault R5. (76 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault R5.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Renault R5 | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Renault | Nissan |
Model | R5 | NP300 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1527 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 76 Nm | 304 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2960 mm |