1984 Renault Siete vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Renault Siete would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1984 Renault Siete. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1984 Renault Siete.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Renault Siete. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Renault Siete. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Renault Siete | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Renault | Citroen |
| Model | Siete | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
