1984 Rover Vitesse vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Rover Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Rover Vitesse would be higher. At 3,531 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Rover Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Rover Vitesse (187 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Rover Vitesse should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 1984 Rover Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Rover Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Rover Vitesse. (298 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Rover Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Rover Vitesse | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Rover | Holden |
Model | Vitesse | Epica |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3531 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2700 mm |