1984 Saab 99 vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Saab 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Saab 99 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1984 Saab 99. (85 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1984 Saab 99.
Because 2010 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Saab 99, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Dakota (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Saab 99. (147 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Saab 99.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Saab 99 | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Saab | Dodge |
Model | 99 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 83 L |