1984 Skoda Rapid R vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C3 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1984 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1984 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 413 kg more than 1984 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C3 (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Skoda Rapid R. 2010 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 1984 Skoda Rapid R has manual transmission. 1984 Skoda Rapid R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Skoda Rapid R | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Skoda | Citroen |
| Model | Rapid R | C3 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2850 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.5 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1263 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 45 L |
