1984 Toyota Hilux vs. 1998 Volvo C70
To start off, 1998 Volvo C70 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Hilux. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Hilux would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Volvo C70 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1984 Toyota Hilux.
Because 1984 Toyota Hilux is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Toyota Hilux. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Toyota Hilux | 1998 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Hilux | C70 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1998 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 236 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |