1984 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 1976 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 3,431 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser (97 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Corona. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Corona.
Because 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Corona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser (226 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Corona. (162 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Toyota Land Cruiser | 1976 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Toyota | Toyota |
| Model | Land Cruiser | Corona |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1976 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3431 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 226 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 88.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 105 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
