1984 Toyota Model F vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Model F would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Toyota Model F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1984 Toyota Model F. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1984 Toyota Model F.
Because 1984 Toyota Model F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Toyota Model F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Toyota Model F. (162 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Toyota Model F.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Toyota Model F | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Toyota | Holden |
| Model | Model F | Epica |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2700 mm |
