1984 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2012 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,042 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion (69 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion should accelerate faster than 1984 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2012 Daihatsu Sirion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion (94 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 Daihatsu Sirion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Volkswagen Polo | 2012 Daihatsu Sirion | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Daihatsu |
| Model | Polo | Sirion |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1042 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 69 HP |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 59 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
