1984 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volkswagen Polo would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (130 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. (74 Nm). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volkswagen Polo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1984 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 1984 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Volkswagen Polo | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Smart |
| Model | Polo | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 1867 mm |
