1984 Volkswagen Rabbit vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volkswagen Rabbit. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volkswagen Rabbit would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 217 more horse power than 1984 Volkswagen Rabbit. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1984 Volkswagen Rabbit.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Volkswagen Rabbit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volkswagen Rabbit. (117 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volkswagen Rabbit.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Volkswagen Rabbit | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Holden |
| Model | Rabbit | UTE |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1715 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 117 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
