1984 Volvo 740 vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volvo 740. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volvo 740 would be higher. At 2,316 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Volvo 740 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (221 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1984 Volvo 740. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1984 Volvo 740.
Because 1984 Volvo 740 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Volvo 740. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Megane (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volvo 740. (186 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volvo 740.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Volvo 740 | 2012 Renault Megane | |
Make | Volvo | Renault |
Model | 740 | Megane |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2316 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2630 mm |